The United States of America v. Charles J. Rothbart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defense counsel’s general objection “lacked specificity” but was “sufficient” to preserve claim for appeal based on prior arguments raising the same substantive argument
• prosecution facilitated witness' departure from jurisdiction by releasing him from subpoena following deposition
• El tribunal dispuso que un testigo no es uno no disponible por el simple hecho de estar fuera de la jurisdicción de la corte. En ese caso, el Estado tomó una deposición a pesar que podía procurar la comparecencia del testigo por medio del subpoena que había efectuado.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).