The United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum, and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Clu, Local 164 v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court has jurisdiction to determine the timeliness of a petition to compel arbitration and when the six-month statute of limitations begins to run under 29 U.S.C. 160(b)
• court justified in reviewing collective bargaining agreement \because the record contain[ed] no clear demand for or refusal of arbitration from which to calculate the limitations period for this cause of action.\
• court justified in reviewing collective bargaining agreement “because the record contained] no clear demand for or refusal of arbitration from which to calculate the limitations period for this cause of action.”
• “There is no dispute that an action to compel arbitration is governed by the 6–month limitations period set forth in § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act,” although this case does not analyze the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).