The Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that interpleaded parties were proper because they were adverse claimants who claimed or might claim to be entitled to the funds held by the stakeholder
• finding that employees were continuously employed and thus entitled to benefits under a retirement income plan
• finding that employees were continuously employed and thus entitled to benefits under a retirement income plan
• finding that employees were continuously employed and thus entitled to benefits under a retirement income plan
• noting that interpleaded parties were proper because they were adverse claimants who claimed or might claim to be entitled to the funds held by the stakeholder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).