The Travelers Insurance Company v. Cuomo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 88% of \non-elderly Americans have private health care insurance through [ERISA] plans\
• declining to follow United Wire because the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit read ERISA’s preemption clause too narrowly and citing United Wire, 995 F.2d at 1196-1203 (Nygaard, J., dissenting)
• “We have little difficulty agreeing with the district court that Rebaldo’s fundamental premise was rejected by the Supreme Court [in Ingersoll-Rand ].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).