The Torrington Company, and Federal-Mogul Corporation v. The United States, and Skf USA Inc. And Skf (u.k.) Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Commerce did not err in basing cash deposit rates on statutory U.S. price instead of entered Customs value
• recognizing exception for matters “capable of repetition, yet evading review”
• sustaining Commerce’s decision to treat inventory carrying costs as indirect selling expenses
• “[T]he antidumping statute...‘merely requires that...the difference between foreign market value and United States price serves as the basis for the assessment rate.’ ”
• “Title 19 requires only cash deposit estimates, not absolute accuracy. These estimates need only be reasonably correct pending the submission of complete information for an actual and accurate assessment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).