The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an appealed CIT decision is not a ‘final court decision’ within the plain meaning of § 1516a(e)”
• holding that, under § 1516a(e), Commerce must publish notice of a court decision that is “not in harmony” with the agency’s determination and must suspend liquidation of subsequent entries pending a “conclusive” court decision
• noting that this concern does not apply to publishing federal register notices
• affirming grant of importer’s application for a writ of mandamus forcing Commerce to publish notice of court decision
• explaining that 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(c)(1
• “It follows that if a word is used in one phrase but omitted in another, the two phrases are intended to mean something different.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).