· 8/28/1996

The Timken Co. v. United States

Citations

937 F. Supp. 953
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1115
20 C.I.T. 1115
18 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2240
1996 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[P]ost hoc rationalization . . . is insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tsoucalas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.