The State v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “neither the thirty-minute delay caused by the wait for a second law enforcement officer, nor the total detention period of almost one hour” exceeded the boundaries of an investigatory stop
• denying motion to dismiss when State’s appeal to the exclusion of results of DUI tests conducted without Miranda warnings was properly brought under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4)
• reversing grant of motion to suppress where trooper who had been sent to investigate a vehicle incident observed signs of alcohol consumption in defendant, conducted breath test which tested positive for alcohol six minutes after stopping defendant, and then radioed for another trooper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).