The State of Texas v. Zachary Duncan James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that federal courts have jurisdiction to hear claims that government violated clear statutory mandate
• “Because the [agency’s] interpretation of the statute is plausible, it does not violate a clear statutory mandate.”
• “Because the [agen- cy’s] interpretation of the statute is plausible, it does not violate a clear statutory mandate.”
• absent the agency exceeding its scope of authority, judicial review of FECA claims is barred
• “When the statute in question is capable of two plausible interpretations, the Secretary’s decision to adopt one interpretation over the other does not constitute a violation of a clear statutory mandate.”
• discussing Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S, 184 (1958)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).