the State of Texas v. Bhavesh G. Patel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing the insurance contracts as “several, and independent of each other” and denying recovery between co-insurers for defense costs
• stating in the context of liability insurance, “[w]e think the authorities uniformly hold that such an insurance contract [containing an “other insurance” clause], in the absence of any statute to the contrary, is valid.”
• “After the judgment in the J.W. Harper suit became final, mandate was duly issued and returned to the district court.”
• “After the judgment in the J.W. Harper suit became final, mandate was duly issued and returned to the district court.”
• “When [one insurer] refused to further assist in the defense of the ... suit, [the other co-insurer] shouldered the entire burden, including the appeals.... In so doing it paid out more than two-thirds of the costs and expenses incurred.”
• “When [one insurer] refused to further assist in the defense of the ... suit, [the other co-insurer] shouldered the entire burden, including the appeals.... In so doing it paid out more than two-thirds of the costs and expenses incurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).