The State of New York v. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases that apply the live testimony exception and noting that this \line of cases . . . follow[s] Orvis\
• affirming district court’s denial of preliminary injunction motion on ground that “appellant has failed to demonstrate by the required showing the threat -of irreparable injury,” making consideration of other requirements unnecessary
• “[A] clear showing of the threat of irreparable harm ... is a fundamental and traditional requirement of all preliminary injunctive relief’
• “[I]t is abundantly clear that the practical, and immediate, effect of the order is the refusal of the injunction sought.”
• “[I]t is abundantly clear that the practical, and immediate, effect of the order is the refusal of the injunction sought.”
• stressing the requirement of irreparable injury on the second branch

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).