The STATE OF LOUISIANA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “But there is nothing in the Administrator’s decision here that indicates that Louisiana would not have prevailed had it been able to prove that AWP did provide the closest price estimate.”
• “But we do not think, given the history of the rulemaking proceeding, that a state complies with federal requirements merely by proving its reimbursements in a particular category do not exceed the aggregate upper limit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).