The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant's unlicensed use of the plaintiff's certification mark on bags of genuine Idaho potatoes was counterfeiting
• holding that the rationale in Mendoza supported the conclusion collateral estoppel could not be imposed against a state agency
• holding that the rationale in Mendoza supported the conclusion collateral estoppel could not be imposed against a state agency
• holding that the rationale in Mendoza supported the conclusion collateral estoppel could not be imposed against a state agency
• holding that the rationale in Mendoza supported the conclusion collateral estoppel could not be imposed against a state agency
• holding that the rationale in Mendoza supported the conclusion collateral estoppel could not be imposed against a state agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).