· 8/15/1994
The Sheppard & Enoch Pratt Hospital, Incorporated v. Travelers Insurance Company
Citations
- 32 F.3d 120
- 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2297
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \the district court should not disturb a benefits determination by a trustee authorized to exercise its discretion unless the decision was unreasonable\
- noting that remand is appropriate if the court concludes that the administrator lacked adequate evidence to make a decision
- assessing reasonableness of plan administrator’s decision based only on facts known at time of decision
- refusing to consider affidavit of beneficiary’s treating physi- cian, when beneficiary failed to submit affidavit to plan review committee
- “Thus, although it may be appropriate for a court conducting de novo review of a plan administrator’s action to consider evidence that was not taken into account by the administrator, the contrary approach should be followed when conducting a review ... under the abuse of discretion standard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.