The Sea Ranch Association v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commissions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing a motion as one brought under Rule 59 when it “requested relief which 21 might have been granted” pursuant to said Rule
• construing a motion styled as an FRCP 59(e) motion as an FRCP 60(a) motion because the court’s amendment memorialized a prior oral ruling, and was thus a correction óf a clerical error properly addressed under FRCP 60(a)
• motion filed three days after entry of judgment which sought reconsideration and clarification under Rule 60(b) deemed to be a motion under Rule 59(e)
• motion filed three days after entry of judgment which sought reconsideration and clarification under Rule 60(b) deemed to be a motion under Rule 59(e)
• abstention appropriate when confronted with the uncertain application of a state statute
• “[N]omenclature is not 23 controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).