Skip to main content
· 3/29/1945

The Rio Novo

Citations

  • 62 F. Supp. 32
  • 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the trial court could not award permanent custody without a finding that the respondent was unfit or had acted inconsistent with his constitutional rights as a parent
  • reversing a custody order where the trial court specifically found that neither parent was unfit and because the trial court failed to make any findings regarding whether the father had acted inconsistently with his parental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bondy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.