THE RESTORATION TEAM a/a/o RICK SANTOS and IDALIA SANTOS v. SOUTHERN OAK INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Rule 1.5 violation where attorney accepted fee but only performed “scant services” that rendered the original fee unreasonable
• “Considering our conclusion that Mr. Wescott did not earn the $7,000 fee that he collected from [the client] and did not return any portion of that fee to [the client] after his representation was terminated, Mr. Wescott violated Rule 1.16(d).”
• “Considering our conclusion that Mr. Wescott did not earn the $7,000 fee that he collected from [the client] and did not return any portion of that fee to [the client] after his representation was terminated, Mr. Wescott violated Rule 1.16(d).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).