The Realex Chemical Corporation v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no res judicata or claim preclusion where, while the legal theory is the same, the accused mark is a newly designed label used on a different product. The cause of action is different and there is no ‘splitting’ of a cause of action.”
• “There is no res judicata or claim preclusion where, while the legal theory is the same, the accused mark is a newly designed label used on a different product. The cause of action is different and there is no ‘splitting’ of a cause of action.”
• “There is no res judicata or claim preclusion where, while the legal theory is the same, the accused mark is a newly designed label used on a different product. The cause of action is different and there is no ‘splitting’ of a cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).