Skip to main content
· 5/13/2013

The People v. Zavala

Citations

  • 216 Cal. App. 4th 242
  • 156 Cal. Rptr. 3d 841
  • 2013 WL 1943814
  • 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • call records were not inadmissible simply because they were produced by human query, where the underlying data was recorded and stored by a reliable computer system at or near each time a user made a phone call

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.