The People v. Urselina King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an appellee’s contention to affirm on an alternative ground because the contention was raised for the first time at oral argument
• “[N]on-expert evidence [that] support[s a litigant’s] theory” is “not a substitute for or cumulative of” an expert’s opinion that can tie together the evidence “based on . . . expertise and training.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).