Skip to main content
· 3/29/1967

The PEOPLE v. Triplett

Citations

  • 226 N.E.2d 30
  • 37 Ill. 2d 234
  • 1967 Ill. LEXIS 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant was entitled to a new trial where polygraph evidence was admitted not only at a hearing on a motion to suppress, but also before the jury when the defendant admitted on cross-examination that a polygraph test showed he was lying
  • defendant was entitled to a new trial where polygraph evidence was admitted not only at a hearing on a motion to suppress, but also before the jury when the defendant admitted on cross-examination that a polygraph test showed he was lying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schaefer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.