The PEOPLE v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that this witness changed his testimony does not establish that he was committing perjury … . The circumstances were fully brought out before the jury who had the right to pass upon the witness’s credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The PEOPLE v. Harper
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-01-19· cited 54×
• People v. Sanders
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-06-27· cited 50×
• The PEOPLE v. Nelson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-05-20· cited 42×
• People v. Gilyard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-04-27· cited 31×
• People v. Outlaw
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-08-14· cited 21×
• People v. Burke
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-08-25· cited 14×
• United States v. Clifford Melvin Robinson, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1964-02-14· cited 3×
• People v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-11-11· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The People v. Wright
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-23· cited 35×
• The PEOPLE v. Bullocks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-23· cited 6×