The PEOPLE v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant could not argue that prosecutor suppressed evidence where defendant was aware of the evidence and could have demanded it be produced in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Nichols
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 60×
• People v. Hovanec
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-09-14· cited 33×
• People v. Nichols
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-03-18· cited 22×
• People v. Bracy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-09-14· cited 19×
• People v. Ramsey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-10· cited 18×
• People v. Hope
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-05-12· cited 7×
• People v. Hutchison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-30· cited 6×
• People v. Kroll
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-02-25· cited 5×
• People v. Lewis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-08-07· cited 4×
• United States ex rel. Gates v. Twomey
  N.D. Illinois· 1971-04-29· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Napue v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
• Giles v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 607×
• The PEOPLE v. Kamsler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-01-19· cited 33×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-04-12· cited 6×
• The PEOPLE v. Bright
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1969-03-27· cited 4×