The People v. Nathaniel Boone , The People v. Albert Cotto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Virginia Supreme Court has stated that the lis pendens statute is applicable to disputes concerning title to real property, but not to an action to recover a personal judgment.” (citing Preston’s Drive Inn Rest., Inc. v. Convery, 154 S.E.2d 160, 163 (Va. 1967))
• “The Virginia Supreme Court has stated that the lis pendens statute is applicable to disputes concerning title to real property, but not to an action to recover a personal judgment.” (citing Preston’s Drive Inn Rest., Inc. v. Convery, 154 S.E.2d 160, 163 (Va. 1967))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).