The People v. Fries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The manifest function of the headgear requirement ... is to safeguard the person wearing it ... from head injuries. Such a laudable purpose, however, cannot justify the regulation of what is essentially a matter of personal safety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).