The People v. Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudicial error in reopening case for the State to present additional evidence
• finding no prejudicial error in reopening case for the State to present additional evidence
• trial court did not err in allowing State to reopen proofs after defense motion for directed verdict where new evidence “could not have taken the defendant by surprise”
• trial court did not err in allowing State to reopen proofs after defense motion for directed verdict where new evidence \could not have taken the defendant by surprise\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).