Skip to main content
· 5/2/1962

The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Third-Party v. Erie Avenue Warehouse Co., Third-Party

Citations

  • 302 F.2d 843
  • 5 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 154
  • 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the doctrine is most frequently applied to cases where restitution is required by common law, and adopting the concept for use in construing a railroad-industry indemnity agreement
  • noting that the doctrine is most frequently applied to cases where restitution is required by common law, and adopting the concept for use in construing a railroad-industry indemnity agreement
  • discussing the “formulated doctrine of acquiescence” in context of an indemnity contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kalodner, Hastie, Ganey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.