· 5/2/1962
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Third-Party v. Erie Avenue Warehouse Co., Third-Party
Citations
- 302 F.2d 843
- 5 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 154
- 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the doctrine is most frequently applied to cases where restitution is required by common law, and adopting the concept for use in construing a railroad-industry indemnity agreement
- noting that the doctrine is most frequently applied to cases where restitution is required by common law, and adopting the concept for use in construing a railroad-industry indemnity agreement
- discussing the “formulated doctrine of acquiescence” in context of an indemnity contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kalodner, Hastie, Ganey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.