Skip to main content
· 1/11/2024

The Mississippi Bar v. Rhett R. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, if true, the petitioner’s allega- tion that the state prevented him from bringing a claim by depriving him of access to all legal materials was sufficient to establish that the escape clause applied
  • describing the tolling effect of the escape clause and explaining that the two-year statute of limitations does not start to run until the necessary infor- mation regarding a petitioner’s claims becomes reasonably available to the petitioner
  • “By its use of the word ‘unless,’ the statute creates an exception to the require- ment * * *.”
  • “By its use of the word ‘unless,’ the statute creates an exception to the require- ment * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.