The Mead Corporation v. McNally Manufacturing Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that while such language is not dispositive of the parties’ intentions, the court looks to the totality of the circumstances
• addressing Ohio’s “battle of the forms” provision that mirrors that of Kentucky
• Court concluded that a clause in the acceptance which allowed the offeree to sue for consequential damages materially altered offer- or’s clause precluding such an action.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).