Supreme Court· 2/28/1824
The Margaret
Citations
- 22 U.S. 421
- 6 L. Ed. 125
- 9 Wheat. 421
- 1824 U.S. LEXIS 378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Due Process Clause does not permit the federal courts to 23 engage in a finely tuned review of the wisdom of state evidentiary rules.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Story
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court· 1934-11-05· cited 170×
- C. J. Hendry Co. v. MooreSupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 86×
- United States v. DowningCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1929-02-27· cited 27×
- United States v. StoneCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1928-04-12· cited 25×
- Hamfton v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1925-02-17· cited 22×
- La Manna v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1926-12-14· cited 22×
- Ashear Bros., Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1965-10-20· cited 22×
- Starkey v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1941-03-04· cited 18×
- Lamont v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1929-01-29· cited 12×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1914-01-07· cited 11×
- United States v. BorgfeldtCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1911-02-01· cited 8×
- Forrest v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1939-06-01· cited 7×
- United States v. Todd & Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1921-04-15· cited 7×
- United States v. Fung Chong Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1946-07-09· cited 6×
- Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1936-10-26· cited 5×
- Anderson v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1943-02-25· cited 4×
- M. & D. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1952-04-29· cited 4×
- Specialty House, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-03-18· cited 3×
- Nahrgang v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1962-01-04· cited 3×
- United States v. Armand Schwab & Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1942-11-02· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.