The Lubrizol Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even the agency's persuasive policy arguments were inadequate to extend the commonly accepted meaning of the word \fuel\ to include \motor oil\ in the absence of any significant support for such an extension in the Act's legislative history
• finding that even the agency’s persuasive policy arguments were inadequate to extend the commonly accepted meaning of the word “fuel” to include “motor oil” in the absence of any significant support for such an extension in the Act’s legislative history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).