The LITTLE FAMILY TRUST v. WELLS FARGO BANK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]he grand jury may not ‘itself violate a valid privilege’ ” and that “courts may quash an otherwise valid grand jury subpoena for an attorney’s testimony under the attorney-client privilege” (quoting Calandra, 414 U.S. at 346, 94 S.Ct. 613)
• recognizing that “[t]he grand jury may not ‘itself violate a valid privilege’” and that “courts may quash an otherwise valid grand jury subpoena for an attorney’s testimony under the attorney-client privilege” (quoting Calandra, 414 U.S. at 346)
• recognizing that “[t]he grand jury 74 may not ‘itself violate a valid privilege’” and that “courts may quash an otherwise valid grand jury subpoena for an attorney’s testimony under the attorney-client privilege” (quoting Calandra, 414 U.S. at 346)
• recognizing that “[t]he grand jury may not ‘itself violate a valid privilege’ ” and that “courts may quash an otherwise valid grand jury subpoena for an attorney’s testimony under the attorney-client privilege” (quoting Calandra, 414 U.S. at 346, 94 S.Ct. 613)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).