The Langfond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 19 “[r]elevancy alone is no longer sufficient – discovery must also be proportional to the needs 20 of the case.”
• concluding defendants were not required to search ESI that “appear[ed] marginal” to resolving the issues in the case
• noting that the proportionality inquiry “requires input from both sides”
• noting that the proportionality inquiry “requires input from both sides”
• discussing impact of 2015 amendments to definition of relevance for discovery purposes
• discussing impact of 2015 amendments to definition of relevance for discovery purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).