The Lane Processing Trust John E. Peterson, Jr., Walter W. Minger, Edward H. Covell, Trustees v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trust distributions made to employees were “wages”
• stating that payments were, “remuneration for employment” because they were “based on factors traditionally used to determine employee compensation, specifically, the value of the services performed ..., the length of ... employment, and ... prior wages.”
• “A party may not present a skeletal argument, leaving the court to put flesh on its bones.” (citation omitted)
• treating trust distributions as wages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).