The Kroger Company v. Malease Foods Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one of the criteria of Ohio's long arm statute must be met in order to find jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant
• holding defendant was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Ohio where “[a]ll of [defendant’s] duties under the agreements were conducted outside of Ohio”
• discussing Kentucky Oaks Mall v. Mitchell’s Formal Wear, 53 Ohio St.3d 73, 559 N.E.2d 477 (1990)
• discussing Ky. Oaks Mall v. Mitchell’s Formal Wear, 53 Ohio St.3d 73, 559 N.E.2d 477 (1990)
• discussing Ky. Oaks Mall v. Mitchell’s Formal Wear, 53 Ohio St.3d 73, 559 N.E.2d 477 (1990)
• transacting any business in Ohio means to “carry on business; to have dealings.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).