Skip to main content
· 11/12/1996

The Kroger Co. v. the Dept. of Revenue

Citations

  • 673 N.E.2d 710
  • 284 Ill. App. 3d 473
  • 220 Ill. Dec. 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the second clause discards “regular course of business” and thus contains a new definition, not a clarification
  • rejecting this construction and applying the functional test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.