The John Fleming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the commentary approved of admissions related to certain legal issues, “such as whether an employee acted within the scope of his employment[.]”
• “[F]or a legally-related request to be deemed admitted . . . , it must connect the relevant legal proposition to specific facts and circumstances of the case.”
• “[F]or a legally-related request to be deemed admitted . . . , it must connect the relevant legal proposition to specific facts and circumstances of the case.”
• “While [Rule 36(c)] allows a party to request an admission of ‘the application of law to fact,’ ‘[r]equests for purely legal conclusions . . . are generally not permitted.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).