The J. C. Hartt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the analyses for lesser included offenses and for merger are the same
• observing that the analyses for lesser included offenses and for merger are the same
• noting that “sexual abuse requires touching for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of either party,” whereas “[t]he offense of sodomy * * * does not require proof of arousal or gratification of the sexual desire of either party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).