The Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hen the contract language is unambiguous on its face, our inquiry ends, and the plain language of the contract controls.”
• charging plaintiff contractor with knowledge of the Federal Regulations even though plaintiff claimed to have no knowledge of any specific provisions
• finding trade practice “irrelevant” as plaintiff did not claim the relevant provision contained a term of art, and thus the court held the “contract’s unambiguous terms govern”
• explaining that contract interpretation is a question of law
• explaining that contract interpretation is a question of law
• industry meaning can be used as an interpre- tative aid in understanding terms in a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).