The Home Indemnity Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lane Powell Moss and Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because this is a diversity action, we apply the substantive law of the forum state” to determine whether a party has waived attorney-client privilege
• “We conclude that the district court properly refused to amend the judgment because Home waived its objection to With input and feedback from the parties, the Court created a jury instruction packet (“Jury Packet”
• applying Alaska privilege law under Fed. R. Evid. 501
• “We conclude that the district court properly refused to amend the judgment because Home waived its objection to the jury’s verdict on □□□ □ Page 12 — es and Order ‘ contribution claim by not objecting to the alleged inconsistency prior to dismissal of the jury”
• applying rule to attorney/client 22 privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).