The Hertz Corp. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegation in “First Amended and Supplemental Complaint” that a patent had been issued since the original complaint was filed “should be viewed as a supplemental pleading accomplishing its intended purposes of healing a jurisdictional defect”
• reserving ruling on motion to dismiss c. 93A claim pending completion of trial on jury claims
• “The defendants have not cited, nor has the court located in its research, any case in which a Chapter 93A claim was dismissed for a failure to allege that anticompetitive effects were felt predominantly in Massachusetts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).