Skip to main content
· 12/13/1996

The Haskell Co. v. Georgia Pacific Corp.

Citations

  • 684 So. 2d 297
  • 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12912
  • 1996 WL 714066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that confidential communications are not subject to disclosure, unless one of the statutory exceptions to the privilege applies
  • “When a privilege is facially apparent, the burden is on the party seeking disclosure to show that the privilege does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.