The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. Pillsbury Company v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc. Two Count Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that section 1920(4) “does not specifically require that the copied document be introduced into the record to be an allowable cost”
• rejecting 10 argument that the phrase means “actually used in this case and made a part of the record,” stating 11 “this narrow interpretation of section 1920(4) . . . is not supported by the plain language of that 12 section or by case law.”
• “[A] 3 document may be ‘necessarily obtained for use in the case’ though it is not offered in evidence at a 4 hearing or trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).