Supreme Court of Florida· 7/15/1970
The Florida Bar v. Randolph
Citations
- 238 So. 2d 635
- 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attorney suffered “professional embarrassment” and was “subjected to the stigma of community suspicion and criticism” prior to resolution of disciplinary complaint
- Supreme Court refused to dismiss a disciplinary action even though over ten years has passed between the time of the wrongdoing and the time the board of governors took final action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-30· cited 43×
- Louisiana Bar Ass'n v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-09-10· cited 13×
- The Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-27· cited 11×
- In re GrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-12-06· cited 11×
- The Florida Bar v. MarksSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-08-28· cited 7×
- The Florida Bar v. PapySupreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-02· cited 6×
- The Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-05-12· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The Florida Bar v. KingSupreme Court of Florida· 1965-04-21· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. OxfordSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-11-30· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-05-31· cited 7×
- Hathaway v. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-03-23· cited 3×
- Florida Bar v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida· 1967-04-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.