Supreme Court of Florida· 4/12/1984
The Florida Bar v. Lancaster
Citations
- 448 So. 2d 1019
- 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a nolo contendere plea along with an adjudication of guilt is sufficient to sustain disciplinary action”
- important factor is not whether there has been an actual adjudication of guilt but whether attorney has been given chance to explain circumstances surrounding plea of nolo contendere and otherwise contest the inference that he engaged in illegal conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-06-04· cited 75×
- In re BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-03-08· cited 16×
- Kinney v. Department of StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-22· cited 15×
- The Florida Bar v. PoplackSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-30· cited 14×
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-17· cited 13×
- Ayala v. Dept. of Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-13· cited 11×
- The Florida Bar v. PavlickSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-04-02· cited 10×
- The Florida Bar v. ColcloughSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-07· cited 9×
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2011-01-13· cited 9×
- The Florida Bar v. MarksSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-08-28· cited 7×
- The Florida Bar v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-08· cited 7×
- In Re ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-12-01· cited 6×
- The Florida Bar v. BroomeSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-05-25· cited 5×
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2011-01-13· cited 5×
- The Florida Bar v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-02-03· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-09-29· cited 1×
- Florida Bar v. CapodilupoSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-02-13
- Son v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-20
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-04-15· cited 125×
- State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-15· cited 82×
- People v. HarfmannSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-11-02· cited 34×
- Dodd v. the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-02-03· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-06· cited 17×
- The Florida Bar v. StillmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-04· cited 16×
- The Florida Bar v. AgarSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-10-09· cited 15×
- Florida Board of Bar Examiners v. LernerSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-07-21· cited 7×
- The Florida Bar v. SilverSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-05-21· cited 3×
- Florida Bar v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-10-02· cited 3×
- Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-13· cited 3×
- Florida Bar v. BunchSupreme Court of Florida· 1967-02-22· cited 2×
- Florida Bar v. DuffeeSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.