Skip to main content

The Florida Bar v. Doe

Citations

  • 550 So. 2d 1111
  • 14 Fla. L. Weekly 490
  • 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1269
  • 1989 WL 117996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disapproving of a termination clause that required the client to pay the greater of $350 per hour or 40 percent of the greatest gross amount offered in settlement because the effect of the clause was to penalize the client for exercising the right to fire the attorney
  • disapproving of a termination clause that required the client to pay the greater of $350 per hour or 40 percent of the greatest gross amount offered in settlement because the effect of the clause was to penalize the client for exercising the right to fire the attorney
  • “An attorney cannot exact a penalty for a right of discharge.”
  • “An attorney cannot exact a penalty for a right of discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named The Florida Bar v. Doe

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.