The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Sandra Porter-Englehart, Sandra Porter-Englehart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “agree[ing]” with the notion that “federal courts should dismiss interpleader actions when federal adjudica- tion would disrupt ongoing state proceedings”
• “agree[ing]” with the notion that “federal courts should dismiss interpleader actions when federal adjudica- tion would disrupt ongoing state proceedings”
• “agree[ing]” with the notion that “federal courts should dismiss interpleader actions when federal adjudica- tion would disrupt ongoing state proceedings”
• those injured by insurance practices proscribed by chapter 176D may sue under chapter 93A
• interpleader inappropriate where no \potentially conflicting claim\ to funds at issue exists
• interpleader is not “a mere convenience for a stakeholder, exercisable at whim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).