The Eli Whitney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court had previously held that a specification did “allege the military offense of obstruction of justice 7 United States v. Fosler, No. 11-0149/MC under Article 134” even though it did not expressly allege the terminal element
• noting challenged guilty finding “must expressly or by fair implication allege an act” constituting the elements of the offense
• “Court of Military Review [CCA] may not make findings of fact contradicting findings of not guilty reached by the factfin-der”
• if a finder of fact excepts an essential element of a charged offense, we are not at liberty to fill it back in, even if we believe that the evidence presented at trial supports proof of that element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).