The Ekco Products Company, Inc. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant, though interested in the patented invention, “was unable to deduce it with the aid of the prior art and the generally known scientific principles” to which it invited the court’s attention, 321 F.2d at 553—54
• prior opinion in same case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).