The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “absent exceptional market conditions, one brand in a market of competing brands cannot constitute a relevant product market”
• noting that a market share of 10% or less is insufficient as a matter of law
• rejecting argument that reservation by franchisor of right to \construct and operate\ additional hotels did not include right to acquire and convert existing enterprise
• calling for consideration of market share, market concentration, entry barriers, consumer demand, competition’s strength, and consolidation trends
• rejecting argument that reservation by franchisor of right to \construct and operate\ additional hotels did not include right to acquire and convert existing enterprise
• collecting cases allowing a finding of attempted monopolization where defendants held 24-50% market shares

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).